Reading Buddies Wrap-Up: “The Woman in White” by Wilkie Collins

Reading Buddies Button

Welcome, Reading Buddies! Sorry for the slightly delayed post — I had to finish The Woman in White this morning. That’s not for a lack of interest but a lack of time! I thoroughly enjoyed Collins’s novel and almost never feel like I was reading a stuffy old classic. Whether that’s because The Woman in White is so enthralling or because I’m getting better at reading older books, I’m not sure!

As always, spoilers are fair game, both in this post and in the comments.

I can’t believe how much I loved this book. It’s the latest in a quick succession of novels I’ve read that employ first-person accounts as a way of compiling a complete and “accurate” narrative. (Another, Bram Stoker’s Dracula, I especially enjoyed.) I really like the way this approach combines potentially unreliable (or at least biased) narrators with the shared goal of accurate reporting. I love hearing from so many different characters and seeing who picks up the thread at what point. It’s so effective in creating a complete picture. As Anne Perry, who wrote the introduction to my Modern Library edition, puts it:

“This not only gives us an immediacy and an urgency that might otherwise be lacking, but, far more cleverly than that, it allows us to see every person through is or her own eyes, so that they become real for us. No one topples over into melodramatic hero or villain, because we understand why they have acted in this or that way” (p. xii).

Even Fosco, cunning mastermind that he is, has a moment to explain himself. Really, the only characters who don’t are Percival and Laura — and I would argue they are the shallowest, most easily stereotyped characters in the entire novel.

The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins (cover)I had said two weeks ago that, though I loved Collins’s writing and the way he drew his characters, I couldn’t tell their narrations apart. That all changed very quickly — Frederick Fairlie, Count Fosco, the servants, each had such distinct styles! I think I didn’t see it initially because, of all the narrators, the first few — Walter and Marian — are perhaps the most similar in their feelings of devotion toward Laura and their commitment to do right by her, which seemed to lend a similar flavor to their writing.

I also had some more time to consider Laura and Marian, who I brought up in my discussion post. One commenter on that post pointed out that Collins was something of a feminist, so I think I agree with those of you who said Marian’s disparaging comments about women were most likely meant sarcastically. I still think it’s silly that her “mannish” strength of character dooms her to be a spinster, but such were the times, I suppose. (Did anyone else think Marian and Walter should have run away together??) As for Laura, terrible things certainly happened to her, but as I read I became more and more convinced she’s just a weaker character than the others. Though perhaps I’d have felt differently if we had had a chance to hear her own voice? Oh well. There were plenty of other more interesting characters in the story. Had Laura been strong enough to right the wrongs done to her herself, we would not have gotten to know those other characters!

I don’t read a lot of suspenseful books, so I discovered something about myself as I read The Woman in White. I think there are readers who pause in their reading to consider the path of a story and work out where they think it might go next, and there are readers who barrel full-speed ahead toward the novel’s conclusion, more interested in finding out how the story ends than forming their own conjectures about it. I, it turns out, am 100% the latter kind. Which one are you — or are you another kind of reader I’ve missed?

A few participants already have their posts up:

I hope you’ll get a chance to visit the other participants. And if you’ve posted about the book on your own blog, please leave your link in the comments below and I’ll add it here!

Looking Back: November 2011

Well. Since I went from a part-time student to a part-time student with a full-time job, my November was nowhere near as productive as usual in terms of reading! I’m really happy with the job and don’t mind my new, much slower reading pace (and the extra driving leaves more time for audiobooks!), but I’m still trying to figure out what it means for Erin Reads. I haven’t opened my Google Reader in a month and hope to spend some time catching up once school is done for the semester. I miss talking books with you!

Here’s what my November looked like:

Books

Looking Back: November

Total books read: 2, plus most of 2 more
Total pages read: 576 (not counting the 2 I haven’t finished!)
Favorite book: A Monster Calls by Patrick Ness
Least favorite book: Well, the only other book I read this month was The Tapestry of Love by Rosy Thornton, but I don’t think it’s fair to call it my least favorite, as I really enjoyed it!

Audiobooks

Total audiobooks listened to: 4
Total hours listened: 37 hours, 51 minutes
Favorite audiobook: Tongues of Serpents by Naomi Novik, just because Simon Vance is positively delightful
Least favorite audiobook: Actually, they were all good: Lost on Planet China by J. Maarten Troost, The Wednesday Wars by Gary D. Schmidt, and 1984 by George Orwell!

Erin Reads

In November:

Your Turn!

That was my November. How was yours? I’d love to hear about it!

Thoughts on “Walk Two Moons” by Sharon Creech (Audiobook)

I think I owned Newbery Medal recipient Walk Two Moons by Sharon Creech when I was a kid, but I definitely never read it. When I saw the audiobook was read by Hope Davis (one of my favorites!), I thought I’d give it a try.

About the Book:

Walk Two Moons by Sharon Creech (audiobook cover)Thirteen-year-old Salamanca Tree Hiddle — “Sal” for short — is about to embark on a road trip with her grandparents. Their destination: Lewiston, Idaho, where Sal’s mother went by bus when she left Sal and Sal’s father not so long ago. Sal’s father is staying behind in Euclid, Ohio, where he and Sal moved after Sal’s mother left.

As the miles roll away behind them, Sal entertains her grandparents with the story of Phoebe Winterbottom — Sal’s friend in Euclid — and her madman. And buried behind this inner story is yet another tale, just between Sal and the reader: her own story, about her life in Bybanks, Kentucky, and what happened before and after her mother disappeared.

My Thoughts:

I’m not sure how I missed Walk Two Moons as a kid — probably in the same way I missed The Phantom Tollbooth. Though, really, I think I appreciated both more as an adult than I would have as a child. I doubt I’d have gotten the depth of Walk Two Moons, the bittersweet interplay between the three stories Sal tells, had I been reading for plot (as I did as a kid).

Creech weaves the three stories together flawlessly. On the surface, Sal and her grandparents have a rather eventful journey west. One level down, Phoebe’s story fills out the narrative and provides an air of mystery. And the innermost story, the tender core of the novel where Sal lets her guard down in little flashes, grabs onto your heart. As the boundaries between the three fade toward the final pages, I think the end is even more poignant because of how these separate stories collapse into the final moments.

Sal is a wonderfully developed character, especially for a middle grade novel. Because we get to see her in so many lights, as well as hear her own voice telling the stories, she is quite multifaceted before the book has gotten very far. She’s strong and determined but also scared, and Creech strikes a perfect balance in her leading lady. Walk Two Moons is truly Salamanca’s journey, and it is a pleasure to watch her make it.

Hope Davis is a fantastic narrator. Walk Two Moons was the third of her audiobooks I’ve listened to, and she has been flawless across the board (even when I didn’t much care for the novel being read — State of Wonder, I’m looking at you!). Her gentle voice and mild accent in Walk Two Moons put the listener at ease and allow him or her to slip effortlessly into the tale unfolding. Davis has the rare gift of being able to take on various roles successfully while at the same time remaining Hope Davis, and she has become one of my go-to narrators. If you’ve yet to try something by her, I can’t recommend her enough.

Those are my thoughts. Check out Walk Two Moons by Sharon Creech on Goodreads or LibraryThing, read a plethora of other bloggers’ reviews, or listen to an Audible sample!

Thoughts on “Blindness” by José Saramago

Blindness by José Saramago was a pick for my IRL book group a few months back.

About the Book:

Blindness by Jose Saramago (cover)In an unnamed country, an epidemic begins: As he waits at a stoplight, a man is struck blind. Faster than it can be combated, the white blindness spreads. How can it be contained? How can it be cured? What should be done with the afflicted? And how can humanity live in a world it cannot see?

I’ll leave it at that. Half the fun of reading a book like Blindness is watching the story unfurl before you as you read!

My Thoughts:

I don’t have much to say about Blindness that hasn’t already been said somewhere, but I couldn’t let this one go without mentioning a few thoughts on it and on Saramago in general.

Blindness is my second book by José Saramago; my first was Death with Interruptions, which I read last year and adored. I struggled with Saramago’s writing style during my first of his novels, but Blindness was much easier to follow. I don’t know if all his books are this way, but the two I’ve read share several things in common: unnamed characters, a lack of traditional formatting (no quotes, for instance, just commas between different speakers’ words), and — my favorite — a premise that takes our own reality and adds one big twist. In Death with Interruptions, death stopped happening. In Blindness, a mysterious blindness spreads through the population. Both novels feature worlds much like our own, then go on to examine how these sweeping events impact that society.

Saramago has a way of making me consider things I’d never thought about before. He takes his chosen topic and applies it to every aspect of society: from language and habits to government and other institutions, from interpersonal relationships to the practicalities of everyday life. I am blown away by how deeply and completely he explores the topic at hand. My curiosity about what he will investigate next, at least as much as the plot itself, keeps me turning pages.

Blindness had more of an overarching story and more consistently present characters than did Death with Interruptions, which I think makes it a better choice as a first Saramago novel if you’ve yet to experience his unique style. I was not one hundred percent satisfied with the end of Blindness, but there is a sequel (Seeing) which I intend to read at some point and that may change my feelings about the end of the former. Blindness is certainly an excellent book, and I’m still puzzling out why Saramago ended the novel the way he did. There must be a reason! Blindness was very much enjoyed by my book group, and I know at least one member has already sought out others by Saramago. I currently have three others on my shelf, and I plan to read them all eventually.

The original translator for Blindness, Juan Sager, passed away before completing his revision. Margaret Jull Costa took over, and she is the same translator who did Death with Interruptions. I don’t envy her, taking over a project with such a distinct and tricky style in the middle, but both translators did an excellent job.

Those are my thoughts. Check out Blindness by José Saramago on Goodreads or LibraryThing, or read a plethora of other bloggers’ reviews!

Thoughts on “The Revisionists” by Thomas Mullen

The Revisionists by Thomas Mullen came to me through LibraryThing’s Early Reviewers program. I read it during last month’s Readathon.

About the Book:

The Revisionists by Thomas Mullen (cover)Zed has been sent from the future to a time around our own. His mission? Keep history (and thus, the seemingly perfect future from which he comes) intact by preventing counter-agents from tampering with events that shaped the course of human existence. All while keeping a low profile and disturbing history by his presence as little as possible.

It’s that latter part he begins to mess up first — his path crosses others’ more than it should. And once that ground begins to crumble, what’s to keep the entire mission from slipping out of his control?

My Thoughts:

The Revisionists is an interesting book, a sort of Dystopian-thriller hybrid. It moves, but not as quickly as I’d expected. It contains lots of contrasting pairs: our present vs. Zed’s, the agents from Zed’s time sent to disrupt history and those sent to preserve it — even the narration, which moves between Zed’s first-person narrative and the third-person accounts of people whose lives brush against Zed’s. These separations start out very distinct, but as the lines between them begin to blur, Zed’s highly structured mission and mindset break down as well. I found the way the structure mirrors the plot rather interesting.

I got a bit muddled in the middle of the book. There is so much going on, so many groups pretending to be other groups but really connected to this or that company that at times I was rather lost. That might have been because I read most of the book in a single sitting, or it may have been intentional on the author’s part. Certainly, some of the characters experience that same sense of confusion. Also, the main plot of The Revisionists takes place in our present, Zed’s past. So, the only glimpses we get of Zed’s own time are through his eyes, his memories. We experience his current mission in the same way, having only his personal account on which to rely. His misunderstandings and assumptions about why he must do what he does are our own. I liked watching the story lines clarify and converge as I neared the novel’s end.

Speaking of endings, I won’t tell you how The Revisionists ends, but I will say I found it quite satisfactory. I think books like this one can be difficult to conclude well, and Mullen took his ending to a place I thought fit the story and characters and that I could believe — at least, as much as I could believe any of the story.

My one criticism of The Revisionists is that it was a bit overly philosophical. Zed gets into a questioning phase, which in theory I can understand but that, in reality, came on too strong. I can see why he would be asking over and over the things he does, but I got a little tired of hearing about it. I don’t think these themes had to be made so explicit in order for the reader to grasp them. On the whole, though, The Revisionists was inventive and fun to read and made for a nice way to pass a chunk of hours during the Readathon.

Those are my thoughts. Check out The Revisionists by Thomas Mullen on Goodreads or LibraryThing, or read other bloggers’ reviews:

Did I miss your review? Please let me know!