Sunday Salon: New and Exciting

The Sunday Salon.comHappy Sunday, everyone! Today I have two brief but exciting (at least, to me) pieces of news to share with you. They’re not related to my reading, though there will be cute cat pictures, if that’s your thing.

First: A Job!

Have you noticed that I have been especially MIA since the Readathon? Not answering comments, not visiting blogs, that sort of thing? It’s been a nutty week. Thank goodness for Alita’s reviewathon, or I’d have had no posts up!

Many of you know that I have been part-time student-ing it for a while now. I cut back this semester to just one class so that I could look for a job. I finally found one! I’m thrilled. It’ll take me a little while to adjust to being so busy, so please bear with me.

Second: A Cat!

Remember that lovely kitty who curled up with me in the final hours of the Readathon last weekend? That’s Nila. I adopted her as a kitten (left photo) just before my senior year of college and moved her around the country with me for a couple of years. She has spent the past few years living with my parents, who graciously took her in when a short-term living situation made keeping pets impossible for me. But, some recent reshuffling has landed Nila back with me, and I’m so happy to have a cat in the house again! Now if only I actually had time to curl up and read with a cat…

And now, as promised, a couple of cat photos:

My cat!

Your Turn!

Tell me, what’s new with you? Any fun plans lined up for Halloween?

Reading Buddies Wrap-Up: “Middlesex” by Jeffrey Eugenides

Reading Buddies Button

Welcome, Reading Buddies! Two things before we jump into Middlesex:

  1. If you haven’t voted for December’s book yet, there’s still time to do so! The poll is over in my sidebar.
  2. We’re reading The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins in November! My copy is on its way to my library as we speak. I’ll post my discussion on November 18th and the wrap-up on December 2nd.

If you’re just stopping by and haven’t read Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides yet, just be warned that spoilers are fair game here. Missed the discussion post? It’s here.

I’ve been thinking about what I wanted to say for this Middlesex wrap-up ever since I finished the audiobook a couple of weeks ago. I haven’t been able to think of anything that hasn’t already been said. I keep finding myself going back to completely inadequate phrases like “Wow!” and “I loved it!” — lame! And then I read this amazing recipe/review by Jenners and Sandy (seriously…amazing…go read it!) and felt extra tongue- (finger-?) tied. And so I’m taking a different approach.

I found a 2003 interview with Jeffrey Eugenides in 3:amMagazine’s online archives that I found really interesting to read. It’s quite long and in-depth, so I chose a couple of bits to share here and encourage you to check out the full article if you’re interested.

I always like to hear about authors’ processes and inspirations, so I’ll start with Eugenides’ explanation of where the idea for Middlesex came from:

Middlesex grew from my first idea, which was to write, basically, the fictional memoir of a hermaphrodite… But, in contrast to the way hermaphrodites have appeared in literature — miserable creatures like Tiresias for instance — I wanted to write about a real person with a real condition. I did a lot of research on the details, but in terms of figuring out what hermaphrodites psychologically went through, I did that from my imagination… The hermaphroditic condition I finally chose, the 5-alpha-reductase deficiency syndrome, is the result of a recessive mutation that happens in isolated communities, usually. At that point I saw the possibility of bringing my own personal history in the book. So, the fictional memoir of a hermaphrodite became a family story and a historical story with a hermaphrodite narrator.”

This explanation prompted me to poke around on Wikipedia a bit to see which elements of Middlesex corresponded to Eugenides’ own life, and (at least according to this particular sometimes-reliable source) there were quite a few: author and character were born in the same year, moved to Middlesex Road following the Detroit riot, attended private schools, had Greek silkworm-farming ancestors, and moved to Berlin, among other things. I’m paraphrasing here, but there is a quote in the Wikipedia article originally from NPR in which Eugenides explains that weaving details from his own life into Middlesex helped him stay grounded while he explored other elements that differed greatly from his own experience.

3:am also asked Eugenides about the story just sort of stopping, which I only barely noticed. Eugenides says:

“It’s a story about metamorphosis and once the metamorphosis was complete, I figured the story was pretty much over. I do have the last chapters where Cal is writing as a male, and you get a certain amount of information of his life, you learn about his continuing romantic problems and his current love-affair. I thought that was sufficient enough for the reader to learn where Cal ended up.”

Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides (cover)Did you feel like Cal’s story was sufficiently concluded? I actually did. I was really sad when the novel was over, just because I loved getting to know Cal and experience Eugenides’ writing and Tabori’s narration (I listened to the audiobook), but I didn’t feel any ends were left dangling or that I had been cheated. The short interludes in present day Berlin gave me enough insight into where Cal ended up to satisfy my curiosity.

I said this last week but I will say it again: if you are thinking about reading (or rereading) Middlesex and you enjoy audiobooks, I cannot recommend this particular masterpiece highly enough. It is exquisite. I’m so glad I got talked into listening instead of reading! Also, thank you thank you to everyone who helped choose Middlesex for Reading Buddies. I’m very happy I finally read it! Now I’m just waiting for The Marriage Plot to come in at the library…

What would you like to talk about regarding Middlesex? Let’s discuss in the comments! And if you posted about Middlesex on your own blog, please feel free to link up so we can keep the discussion going.

Thoughts on “Dracula” by Bram Stoker (Audiobook)

I listened to Dracula by Bram Stoker on audio for Allie’s October readalong. If you don’t know anything at all about Dracula, go read it for yourself! I don’t want to ruin it for you. If you’ve read it, or if you know the story’s outline, you can read further without fear of spoilers.

About the Book:

Dracula Readalong BadgeWritten in 1897 by Irish author Bram Stoker, Dracula tells the story of the infamous Count Dracula of Transylvania and his nefarious nocturnal activities. Though not the first vampire novel ever written, it is one of the best known. It follows the Count’s movements and actions through the letters and journals of a small band of people who both believe in and desire to eliminate him.

My Thoughts:

Until I met Dracula, I thought I hated all scary, creepy, and otherwise Halloween-appropriate novels. Turns out that’s not the case at all. On the contrary, Dracula delighted me and left me trying to find times to listen to just a bit more. Apparently I’m not opposed to classic horror at all!

I think what I liked best about Dracula was its format. It’s epistolary, made up entirely of letters and journal entries. I know many other novels have used this approach with varying success, but in Dracula, it was perfect. The start of the novel explains that because what follows are the immediate impressions of those involved, no one can claim memories became less accurate with time or accounts may have been heavily edited before being written. At the same time, of course, it is difficult to know how accurate these first-person eyewitness accounts really are. The story contains an explanation as to how the pieces of the novel came to be organized chronologically into a single volume, which I appreciated.

As a newcomer to the vampire genre, I appreciated how Dracula laid out some of the ground rules of vampires. I don’t know how universal the lore presented in Stoker’s classic is, but several pieces were familiar, at least, which led me to believe the rest might be common as well. Because I knew so little about vampires going in, I really had no idea what was happening at some points or why certain events or discoveries boded what other readers may have known they did. I had fun discovering the answers along with the characters.

Dracula by Bram Stoker (audiobook cover)I liked the whole little band of good people voluntarily plunging into darkness and evil to eradicate the plague on humanity that is Count Dracula. My favorite character, though, was undeniably Abraham van Helsing — what a bad-ass! I loved his cryptic comments and mysterious ways. He’s the only one of the gang who doesn’t contribute much first-person recollection to the narrative, which makes him even more intriguing and inscrutable.

My one complaint — and it’s only a minor one — was the length. When everyone was hanging out in England, perhaps there could have been a little less sitting around, a few fewer vampire encounters before they got the ball rolling. I think I would have gotten bored in a couple of spots if I’d been reading the book. On audio, though, I got through it just fine.

Speaking of the audiobook, the narrator I listened to was Robert Whitfield, and he was excellent. His sense of drama was just right, taking the story seriously but not overly so. He varied each character’s voice just enough that you could tell who was talking. The only rough spot was his American accent, which came out about 75% Southern and 25% British — still much better than my own British accent! Overall, an excellent way to experience Stoker’s classic vampire story for the first time.

Was Dracula a touch cheesy in spots, a little overdramatic? Of course. But I thoroughly enjoyed it and found it perfect for some Halloween-ish October reading.

Those are my thoughts. Check out Dracula by Bram Stoker on Goodreads or LibraryThing, read a plethora of other bloggers’ reviews, or listen to an Audible sample!

Dueling Monsters 2011: Doctor Moreau vs. Cthulhu

Dueling Monsters is an annual event hosted by Jill and Heather. They each choose a literary monster to go head to head, then participants pick sides and declare a winner. I read both books last year and had a blast. This year I figured I’d only be able to read one of the two, but when I found out their total page count barely surpassed 130, I decided to read both.

Dueling Monsters 2011

What were the books, you ask? Jill chose The Call of Cthulhu by H.P. Lovecraft, and Heather chose The Island of Doctor Moreau by H.G. Wells. I’ll start with my thoughts on each, then move on to declare my winner.

Both Cthulhu and Moreau, as I’ll call them to save on typing, are brief. They’re also both written as though some first-person narrator has uncovered a relative’s bizarre and unbelievable manuscript or research which is, of course, included or summarized. In Cthulhu, a young artist’s dark and strange dreams lead back to a creepy cult. In Moreau, a shipwrecked gentleman finds refuge on an isolated island where, he suspects, hidden atrocities are being committed.

As stories, I preferred Moreau to Cthulhu. The former had more substance (being longer) but also included dialogue and was written in a more engaging style. The latter was brief but also told mostly through narration instead of conversation, reading more like a research paper to me than a short story. The horror of Moreau felt more immediate, the story being, as it was, experienced first-hand by the narrator, whereas Cthulhu‘s tale was pieced-together writings based on scraps of evidence and newspaper clippings based on shaky testimonies of witnesses who may or may not have told the whole truth.

Now. Who’s the better (or worse) monster? “Monster” can mean a lot of things, and Cthulhu and Moreau — though both clearly monsters in their own rights — are vastly different. For some guidelines, I’ll turn to dictionary.com, which defines “monster” thusly:

mon·ster, noun:

  1. a legendary animal combining features of animal and human form or having the forms of various animals in combination, as a centaur, griffin, or sphinx.
  2. any creature so ugly or monstrous as to frighten people.
  3. any animal or human grotesquely deviating from the normal shape, behavior, or character.
  4. a person who excites horror by wickedness, cruelty, etc.
  5. any animal or thing huge in size.

 Definition 1: Mixed Form

By definition 1, Cthulhu wins. Moreau is a man, but Cthulhu is “a monster of vaguely anthropoid outline, but with an octopus-like head whose face was a mass of feelers, a scaly, rubbery-looking body, prodigious claws on hind and fore feet, and long, narrow wings behind.” I’d say that’s a mixed form!

Definition 2: Frightening Ugliness

The definition includes monstrousness along with ugliness, but since “monster” is what we’re trying to examine here, and one should not use any form of the word being defined to define the word in question, I’ll just go with the latter. Both monsters in question are ugly, though it is Cthulhu’s physical form and character versus Moreau’s character that are so hideous. Since Cthulhu is double ugly, the point goes to him.

Definition 3: Grotesque Deviation from the Norm

Hmm. I suppose one could argue that Cthulhu is a typical specimen of his sort. Having never met another, I cannot say. I’m going to assume that, as far as Old Ones from the stars go, he’s rather run-of-the-mill, even if to us humans he seems a grotesque deviation from what we know. Moreau, on the other hand, appears to be a creature we recognize, yet inside he is twisted enough to horrify his fellow men. Point to Moreau.

Definition 4: Excites Horror

This definition is a little unfair to Cthulhu, since it explicitly states “person,” which Cthulhu certainly is not. He is wicked, surely, yet I think what initially excites horror is his rather hideous physical form (see Definition 1 explanation). Moreau, on the other hand, should appear next to this particular meaning of “monster” in the dictionary. His cruel and pointless island experiments leave the narrator as well as the reader disgusted and horrified and earn him a point here.

Definition 5: Size

Cthulhu is the clear winner when it comes to size. He is described as being “a gigantic thing ‘miles high’ which walked or lumbered about.” Moreau, in contrast, seems to have been man-sized.

The Final Score and Winner

Adding up the totals, Cthulhu ends up with 3 points, while Moreau has only 2. So, even though my personal preference is for Moreau as a story, it seems Cthulhu is this year’s winner, by a hair (or tentacle?)!

Dueling Monsters 2011: Cthulhu

Have you read these? Which would you choose? What other monsters have you encountered in literature?

Sunday Salon: Readathon Wrap-Up

Whew, the Readathon is over, for now! First I have to say, thank you, thank you, thank you to the fantastic organizers, my super-human co-Cheerio Trish, and our amazing cheerleaders. You guys did such a wonderful job!!

I’d love to catch up with everyone today, but instead I’ll be studying like mad and then driving home from my parents’ house. I hope you had a great time readathon-ing!

As is traditional, here’s my event wrap-up and answers to the end-of-event meme:

Wrap-up

Readathon

I ended up reading for 8 hours and 20 minutes, listening for 30 minutes, and cheering for 3 hours and 15 minutes. I also spent some time doing admin-y type things for the cheerleading side of things, which I probably should have counted as cheering time but neglected to track.

For all that reading, I only got through 420 pages, finished one book (The Revisionists by Thomas Mullen) and started two others (The Tapestry of Love by Rosy Thornton and A Monster Calls by Patrick Ness). I will definitely finish both — I only switched in an attempt to keep myself awake!

Usually I love the minichallenges and do almost all of them. I didn’t do any this time! I think a large part of it was that I’m not at home, so it was harder to find book titles to make a sentence, for instance. Also, I spent a lot more time doing non-reading things this time around, and I think I (a) didn’t want to take away more reading time, and (b) didn’t need to use the minichallenges for breaks the way I have in the past. I did host my first minichallenge, though, which was tons of fun! If you missed it, check it out. The contest is closed, but some of the answers are awesome.

End-Of-Event Meme

  1. Which hour was most daunting for you?
    That would have been hour 17, when I was getting sleepy and then my favorite cat came and snuggled into my lap. I definitely took a little nap, then woke up and went to bed in hour 18! I probably could have gotten myself going again, but I start a new job tomorrow and didn’t want to be completely dead.

    Readathon Cat
    I blame the cat.
  2. Could you list a few high-interest books that you think could keep a Reader engaged for next year?
    I wish I’d started A Monster Calls by Patrick Ness earlier, because it would have been perfect! Last year I read The Phantom Tollbooth by Norman Juster, which was great. The Readathon is the perfect time to breeze through those lighter books you’ve been planning to read!
  3. Do you have any suggestions for how to improve the Read-a-thon next year?
    Probably have a list of readers on the main site. Would be a pain to add, but the cheerleader list isn’t complete — it only covers readers who have some sort of contact link the cheerleaders can use.
  4. What do you think worked really well in this year’s Read-a-thon?
    The new Google forms sign-up. As an organizer, it was SO much easier to use this than I’m guessing the linkys of the past have been.
  5. How many books did you read?
    Only one. Though I did start two others. And I listened to a little of my current audiobook.
  6. What were the names of the books you read?
    The Revisionists by Thomas Mullen, The Tapestry of Love by Rosy Thornton, and A Monster Calls by Patrick Ness. I also listened to a bit of The Devil in the White City by Erik Larson.
  7. Which book did you enjoy most?
    I don’t think I can say, since I only finished one! I can say that I’m definitely looking forward to finishing the two I only started.
  8. Which did you enjoy least?
    N/A this time around. I enjoyed them all!
  9. If you were a Cheerleader, do you have any advice for next year’s Cheerleaders?
    If next year’s cheerleaders are as awesome as this year’s, it’s going to be a great Readathon!
  10. How likely are you to participate in the Read-a-thon again? What role would you be likely to take next time?
    Oh, I’ll be participating if I can. I really don’t know what role I’d take. Definitely reader. I think it will depend on how much time I have to devote to the actual event as well as in the days leading up to it.

Your Turn!

Did you participate in the Readathon? Tell me all about it! If you didn’t participate, do you think you ever will in the future?