Thoughts on “The Weird Sisters” by Eleanor Brown (Audiobook)

I’d read some good reviews of The Weird Sisters by Eleanor Brown, so when I needed an audiobook and saw my library had this one on the shelf, I decided to give it a go for my daily commute.

About the Book:

The Weird Sisters by Eleanor BrownTiny Barnwell, Ohio, hometown to the three Andreas sisters, is the last place Bean and Cordy Andreas expect to end up. Rose is the homebody; her two younger sisters have flown far away. But when their mother is diagnosed with breast cancer, Bean and Cordy discover they have their own reasons to add to the list in favor of coming home.

With three grown girls home together, the unifying force of their mother out of commission, and their Shakespeare scholar of a father lost in his own literary world, things under the Andreas family’s roof aren’t exactly smooth. But back in tiny, boring Barnwell, at once familiar and foreign, the sisters have little to do but read novels — and face the roadblocks that sent them home in the first place.

Rife with Shakespeare references and rich with quiet truths, The Weird Sisters is about the ties that hold a family together and the struggle to soar in one’s own skin.

My Thoughts:

The Weird Sisters wasn’t what I’d expected. I’d been thinking it would be something a bit Gothic, perhaps, involving a dusty little bookshop and a bit of mystery. I don’t know where I got that impression. It’s not like that at all.

There were a couple of things I really liked about The Weird Sisters. First, Eleanor Brown really gets sister dynamics. At the same time, though, I didn’t think she relied too heavily on stereotypes. The relationships between Rose, Bean, and Cordy are complicated and ring true. Brown mixes childhood memories in with the storyline, giving the reader glimpses of the path the girls tread to get to where they are when we first meet them. Brown also writes in the first person plural, so that the story is told by “we” — presumably, the sisters. It caught me off guard at first, but this interesting approach came to feel right as I listened.

I also appreciated that nothing came too easily, and nothing was resolved the simple way. The girls got to where they needed to be, which wasn’t necessarily where I thought they were headed, and each got where she was going via a path I found believable. What could have been cheesy or sappy was instead satisfying and realistic.

I’m sure I missed most of the Shakespeare references in The Weird Sisters. They are constant. The characters quote the Bard to one another. “Our father,” as the narrators refer to their dad, speaks almost solely in Shakespearean snippets. The girls themselves are named for women in Shakespeare’s plays: Rose is short for Rosalind, Bean for Bianca, and Cordy for Cordelia. I wouldn’t be surprised if the sisters’ lives shadowed their Shakespearean counterparts (my Shakespeare knowledge is, sadly, too rusty to comment). I can say, though, that an intimate knowledge of the man’s plays is not a prerequisite for enjoying The Weird Sisters!

Kirsten Potter did a nice job narrating. I had thought she was a new-t0-me reader, but I later realized she’d read the production of Brooklyn by Colm Tóibín I enjoyed so much last year. I never one hundred percent forgot I was listening to a narrator and got swept away by the story, but her presence between myself and the novel was slight and didn’t bother me. I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend The Weird Sisters on audio.

Those are my thoughts. Check out The Weird Sisters by Eleanor Brown on Goodreads or LibraryThing, read a plethora of other bloggers’ reviews, or listen to an Audible sample!

Reading Buddies Discussion: “A Room with a View” by E.M. Forster

Reading Buddies Badge

Hello, Reading Buddies! Well, I’m halfway through A Room with a View by E.M. Forster (spoilers are fair game!) and I’ve yet to take a single note. I love it when I’m so absorbed in a book — and a classic in particular — that note-taking falls by the wayside. The problem, of course, is that I have very little to talk about here!

An interesting tidbit (thanks to my go-to quick reference source, Wikipedia): Though A Room with a View was published in 1908, the third of five novels published during Forster’s lifetime, it was actually the first one he started.

A Room with a View by E.M. Forster (cover)I’m enjoying the novel immensely. I’ve previously read Howards End, A Passage to India, and The Hill of Devi by Forster (the last one nonfiction), and none quite prepared me for how very entertaining I’m finding A Room with a View. I think Forster’s wit and sense of humor really shine, and I’m loving it.

I’ve finished the first part, with Lucy and Charlotte in Italy, and am a few chapters into the next section, back in England. The jump between the two was so sudden that I checked to be sure my ebook copy from Project Gutenberg was complete (I think it is!). I expect the story to be filled in a bit as I read. At this point, I’m not Cecil’s biggest fan — especially since I’ve just discovered Lucy tends to imagine him in a room…without a view! I suspect somehow George Emerson will show up again, since he and his father gave up their rooms with views at the novel’s beginning. I love when the title is worked cleverly into the book, and Forster seems to be doing a nice job of it so far.

I don’t have much else to say! How are you liking A Room with a View? Is it your first Forster? Anything in particular you’d like to discuss?

Thoughts on “1984” by George Orwell (Audiobook)

I’ve always felt I should read 1984, so when I discovered my library had a version read by Frank Muller, a narrator I know I enjoy, I borrowed the recording to keep me occupied during my daily commute.

About the Book:

1984 by George Orwell (cover)Published in 1949, George Orwell’s 1984 is a classic dystopian novel. The year is — as you might guess — 1984. A country called Oceania, in the grip of Ingsoc (English Socialism), is perpetually at war. And Winston Smith is about to do something he knows he should not. Hidden away in the corner of his apartment, in an alcove sheltered from the all-seeing eye of the ubiquitous telescreen, Winston begins to write an illicit journal. He knows it’s only a matter of time before the Thought Police detect his crime and have him eliminated. But Winston is also beginning to suspect there might be those who oppose the Party — might even be such rebels amongst his acquaintances.

As Winston moves through his world, illuminating the politics, daily life, and culture for the reader as he goes, he follows his hunch, groping blindly in the darkness of the unknown, unsure what form the inevitable consequences will take.

My Thoughts:

There are a lot of really cool things going on in 1984. My first thought, on beginning the audiobook, was how interesting it was to read a novel set in what was, at the time, the future, but which is now the past. Where many current writers base futuristic works on technological gadgets and space travel and the like, Orwell poured most of his attention into building up a political system so pervasive that no citizen and no aspect of life was beyond its influence. I loved watching him develop this chilling future world.

As I got further into the book, I became ever more impressed with this world Orwell had constructed. About halfway through, I lost interest in Winston’s story, but the system in which he existed continued to fascinate me. The principles of the Party, its tenants and inner workings, its goals and the means by which it accomplished them were so fully developed and effortlessly locked into place. It is a system rife with sinister manipulation, ruthless policies, and colossal lies made into unquestionable truths. I wondered again and again at Orwell’s logic and at how clearly he understood power.

My favorite part of 1984 came after the story was over. Orwell tacked on an explanation of Newspeak, the official language of Oceania, including its purpose and basic linguistic rules. I love linguistics and was absolutely enthralled by this little piece. The purpose behind Newspeak, Orwell explained, was to standardize and control language, carefully weeding out variation and undesirable meanings until a final ideal form was reached — a form in which it would not be possible to articulate in speech or thought any idea in opposition to the Party. He went on to outline the parts of speech and their formation and give usage examples. I loved it.

Frank Muller read the audio production I chose. I know there are many listeners who don’t love Muller’s interpretations of the classics, but I have listened to several by him and have very much enjoyed his narrations. Unless you already know you dislike his style, I’d absolutely recommend Muller’s version of Orwell’s 1984.

For anyone interested, the Wikipedia article on 1984 outlines much of the novel, though of course there are spoilers galore!

Those are my thoughts. Check out 1984 by George Orwell on Goodreads or LibraryThing, or read a plethora of other bloggers’ reviews!

Reading Buddies: February Pick

It’s that time again: time to announce the next Reading Buddies book and kick off a new poll! But first, just a reminder that this month’s read is A Room with a View by E.M. Forster, which I’m liking quite a bit so far. The Goodreads thread is up, and I’ll be posting about the book on January 13 and 27. Feel free to join in if you’d like!

Reading Buddies badge and The Razor's Edge by W. Somerset Maugham (cover)

February’s book, which won with more than two thirds of the votes, will be The Razor’s Edge by W. Somerset Maugham. I’ll post about it on February 10 and 24. I read some of Maugham’s short stories last year and really enjoyed them, so I’m looking forward to reading The Razor’s Edge with those interested — who’s in? Here’s a bit about it to whet your appetite (from Goodreads):

“Intimate acquaintances but less than friends, they meet and part in postwar London and Paris: Elliot, the arch-snob but also the kindest of men; Isabel, considered to be entertaining, gracious, and tactful; Gray, the quintessence of the Regular Guy; Suzanne, shrewd, roving, and friendly; Sophie, lost, wanton, with a vicious attractiveness about her; and finally Larry, so hard and so trustful, lost in the world’s confusion. Their story, one of Somerset Maugham’s best, encompasses the pain, passion, and poignancy of life itself.”

The poll for March’s book is up in the sidebar. Please be sure to vote for your preference! In an attempt to incorporate my other two reading projects with Reading Buddies, I’ve included a classic (Smith) and a just READ it book (Calvino) plus a novel I’ve been meaning to read for a while (Stegner). I think I’ll try using this “formula” for a few months and see how it goes. Let me know if you particularly like or hate it!

I can’t link to the titles within the poll itself, but I thought I’d try to make researching unfamiliar titles easier on you by including links to each book’s Goodreads listing here: A Tree Grows in Brooklyn by Betty Smith, If On a Winter’s Night a Traveler by Italo Calvino, Crossing to Safety by Wallace Stegner. Now go, research, and vote!

The 2011 Stats Post

Now that it’s officially 2012, I can do my final wrap-up of 2011! This is the first year I have previous data against which to compare, so please excuse me while I get geeky about reading stats. I don’t read just for the stats, nor do I obsess about them, but I do enjoy tracking them!

Reading in 2010 vs. 2011

2011 Overall Reading Stats

I read almost the same number of books in 2010 and 2011: 114 (23,859 pages) in the former and 117 (21,680 pages) in the latter. With no planning on my part, my print vs. audiobook numbers worked out to be rather similar. My 2011 audiobooks must have been a lot longer, though, since I listened for nearly twice as many hours last year as I did the year before!

2011 Stats Sources

One issue I addressed a few weeks ago is that of review copies. Looking at book source data, the number of ARCs I read in 2011 more than tripled from 2010, from 8 to 25, a shift that didn’t make me as happy as I’d have liked. I’ve always meant to read more books I already own, and while I did borrow fewer books in 2011, the jumps in numbers of ARCs and ebooks meant I read fewer of my own books than I did in 2010. I’m not setting official goals this year, but I do hope my “owned” number is much higher next year. (I should note that audiobooks are not included in these numbers, since I borrow almost all of them from my public library.)

Reading in 2011

2011 Books by Publication Year

Above are the percentages of books I read/listened to by publication year each month. 2011 was the first full year of my Classics Reclamation Project, and I started and ended strong, with classics (the blue line, defined for my project as pre-1952, or at least 50 years old) making up about 30% of my monthly reading. But in the middle, they took quite a dip — there’s even a month where I didn’t read a single one! I’d definitely like to get back to reading classics in 2012. An opposite phenomenon occurred with new releases (the green line), which took up a large chunk of my summer reading. I’m happy with the red line, or non-classics backlist titles, making up the largest chunk of my reading.

2011 Books by Reason for Reading

This final chart shows my reading by reason. The blue line shows books I picked up on my own initiative, while the red line shows books I read for review. They flip-flopped quite a lot this year, but I’d like to always be reading more books of my own choosing than for review in the future.

In Conclusion

I’m not creating goals for myself for 2012. However, reviewing my 2010 and 2011 stats has helped me see where I might like to tweak my reading and justified my decision to cut down on review copies. It’s also satisfied my stats cravings for another year!

Did you do a reading stats overview for 2011? Did you learn anything cool? Feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments so I can check it out!