Sunday Salon: Who Wrote This Book?

The Sunday Salon.comThis evening, like many other people, I’ll be watching the Super Bowl, something I look forward to every year. So, today’s Sunday Salon post will be short. Whether you’re watching the game or not, enjoy your Sunday!

At a book group meeting a couple of months ago, we had a brief discussion about authors. Without really thinking about it, I’ve always tended to separate novelists from their books. I enjoy learning a little about an author, and I like knowing if his or her life experiences have somehow found their way into a book. But I don’t tend to seek out full biographical details about authors. I’ve never read a full biography; I usually prefer to know only what’s immediately relevant to the book.

I know there are many readers who love to delve into favorite authors’ lives. I can understand why someone might want to do so. The more I read, the more I consider how inseparable a book is from the person who writes it. It makes me wonder, what makes an author tick? What is/was their life like? What experiences, preferences, and beliefs guide and inspire them to write about what they do? Through what lens do they view the world? Which events and people have shaped them? These questions inevitably affect the novel that is produced, and I imagine exploring them can yield a context for and a deeper understanding of a novel.

But sometimes, knowing too much can be a mistake, to some: a fellow reader once told me he read a biography of his favorite poet, only to discover the poet behind the beautiful poetry wasn’t a good person at all. How, then, does this new knowledge affect one’s reading of those much-loved poems? Does it, even?

I’m curious to hear about your preferences. Do you separate novel and novelist, make it a point to read up on authors, or fall somewhere in between? What are your reasons for reading the way you do? Have you ever had an experience where you went against your normal reading habits and either regretted it or were glad you did?

My Week in Books: January 30-February 5

My Week in Books

Welcome to my weekly Saturday feature here at Erin Reads, where I highlight new books that have entered my life, what I’ve been reading, and what’s happened on Erin Reads over the past week.

New Acquisitions

No vlog today–it just didn’t happen this week. It should be back next week. As for acquisitions, my husband and I did make a trip to Half Price Books, where I pounced on a couple exciting finds:

  • All the Names by Jose Saramago: I’ve been a little bit obsessed with Jose Saramago ever since I read Death with Interruptions last year. I haven’t yet read anything else by him, but I’m pretty sure he’s one of those authors whose entire bibliography I’ll read eventually. Steph of Steph & Tony Investigate! reviewed All the Names before I read her blog, and I discovered her review while perusing their review database. I didn’t find this one in the clearance section, but I think Saramago is worth a little more.
  • Five Quarters of the Orange by Joanne Harris: I’ve only read Chocolat by Harris, but it was a dreamy sort of book and I’ve wanted to try something else by her. There’s something intriguing about the title of this one, so when I found a hardcover copy in the clearance section, I picked it up. The woman at the register gushed a bit about it when she saw what I was buying, so my hopes are high.

TBR Additions

I’ve added lots of books to my TBR list this week, and I haven’t even gotten to my reader for the second half of the week!

Read This Week

I haven’t had a lot of time to sit and read this week, it’s seemed. I did finish The Spy Who Came In from the Cold by John le Carre, and I’ve gotten about halfway through Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte. I refuse to rush my reading of Jane Eyre, as I only get to read it for the first time once! I also finally opened The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver, one of this month’s Reading Buddies books.

On audio, I’ve been switching between The Heretic’s Daughter by Kathleen Kent and A Walk in the Woods by Bill Bryson (the second Reading Buddies book for February). They are, as you might guess, quite different from one another, but I am enjoying listening to both.

Erin Reads Recap

Your Turn!

How was your reading week? Do tell!

Reading Buddies Discussion: “A Walk in the Woods” by Bill Bryson

Reading Buddies Button

Hello reading buddies! I hope you’re all enjoying A Walk in the Woods by Bill Bryson. I’ve been listening to William Roberts read this chronicle of hiking the Appalachian Trail on audio, and so far, so good. Roberts reads at a steady clip with good inflection, and it’s an absorbing book. I’m smack dab in the middle, though for most of this post it won’t matter as long as you’ve gotten a little way into the book. I’ll warn of spoilers if I get too specific!

It’s been years since I’ve read anything by Bryson. In those intervening years, I’d forgotten how fantastic he is at blending science, history, pop culture, and personal experience into a hybrid of memoir and straight nonfiction. He shifts around just enough to keep me interested. I find myself learning all kinds of fascinating (if occasionally mildly outdated) things without ever getting bored. Bryson is, of course, a funny man, and I find myself snickering quite a lot, but I get the feeling that even without his keen sense of humor he’d be able to write books I’d be happy to read.

Listening to A Walk in the Woods has set straight my mental picture of what hiking the Appalachian Trail entails. For instance:

  • A Walk in the Woods by Bill Bryson (cover)I never really thought about just how much stuff you’d have to have to take with you for months and months of hiking. I loved the scene at the beginning of the book where Bryson is at the store trying to purchase equipment, though I was mildly appalled by how much he needed!
  • I always imagined a trail through such an expanse of wilderness wilderness would be lonely and isolated, always. Granted, it is, for long stretches, but hikers seem to see one another much more often than I’d assumed.
  • I was surprised by the camaraderie shared between hikers sharing shelters, camping together, or even passing one another on the trail. The shared experience of hiking the AT, I suppose, provides the groundwork for a (usually) friendly relationship.
  • I had no idea there were such frequent opportunities for hikers to go into town for a bath, a nice meal, and a good night’s sleep in a real bed.

I’m pretty sure I’ll never hike the whole trail, even though several people I know are seriously interested. Maybe a day or two…maybe. Have you hiked or thought about hiking the whole or partial trail?

For those of you who are at least halfway through (kind of a SPOILER! if you haven’t): What do you think of Bryson and Katz’s decision not to hike the whole trail? I can understand why they skip parts, but I think if I was in their situation, I’d feel like I had to walk the whole thing.

If you’re reading or have read A Walk in the Woods, feel free to share your thoughts and/or pose questions for other participants here. Please be careful to warn of spoilers in your comments! I’d also love to know if you’ve discussed the book on your blog so that I can link to your post in the wrap-up post, two weeks down the line.

Ready…set…discuss!

Thoughts on “Reading Lolita in Tehran” by Azar Nafisi

Three factors combined to make me finally pick up Reading Lolita in Tehran by Azar Nafisi, which I’ve owned approximately forever. First, the TBR Dare has me focused on my own shelves. Second, one of my goals for 2011 is to read more memoirs. And third, the World Party Reading Challenge country for January was Iran. The result was that I finally got around to reading this book!

About the Book:

Reading Lolita in Tehran by Azar Nafisi (cover)Reading Lolita in Tehran is Azar Nafisi’s account of living in Tehran and teaching Western literature off and on at its universities for nearly twenty years, from the late 1970s to the late 1990s. Nafisi returned to Iran during the Iranian Revolution, stayed through the long years of the Iran-Iraq war, and eventually moved to the United States in 1997.

The book is divided into four parts, with each part named after a Western novel or author: Lolita, Gatsby, James, and Austen. At the beginning and end, in Lolita and Austen, are Nafisi’s recollections of the secret all-girls book group she held weekly at her home during her final years in Iran. In the middle, in Gatsby and James, Nafisi recounts her earlier experiences, teaching and living in Iran. In each section, the title book or author is woven into Nafisi’s tale.

My Thoughts:

Reading Lolita in Tehran was a slow read for me, but not in a bad way. It covers a whole lot of ground in depth: twenty years of Iranian history and politics, a fair number of classic Western novels, and, of course, Nafisi’s personal experiences as a teacher, woman, mother, friend, and mentor in a turbulent, unstable country. At times, it was like reading a history book; at others, like listening to a college-level literature lecture. There was far more in Reading Lolita in Tehran than the memories of a single life, though of course it was that life which held everything else together and gave the vantage point from which the other aspects were viewed.

The history was difficult for me to follow at times. Because Nafisi doesn’t narrate her story chronologically, and because I’m relatively new to Iranian history, I had a lot of trouble remembering who was who and what happened when to cause what. Instead of perceiving clearly defined time periods, I instead felt the weight of history as an indistinct force coloring the daily lives of the country’s inhabitants. If asked to reconstruct a precise timeline, I would fail miserably; yet I am left with an overall sense of that time.

The novels and authors around which Nafisi shaped her memoir were mostly familiar to me. I’ve read Lolita and The Great Gatsby and a novel each (though not the ones Nafisi discusses) by James and Austen. Still, I felt as I read that I should have made a reading list for myself and checked off each book before tackling Reading Lolita in Tehran. I think I would have gotten much more out of it had I been able to understand Nafisi’s examples and comparisons not just from her brief explanations, but from having recently read the works discussed myself. The works and authors she teaches are deeply entwined with Nafisi’s memoir, and I do think there’s a deeper level one can reach if one is familiar with everything Nafisi cites.

The parts most in line with my idea of memoir–the personal experiences, memories, feelings–were also the easiest for me to relate to. It was here I could most clearly see life in Tehran: in Nafisi’s relationships with her family, friends, coworkers, and students; in the requirements that made her bristle and the concessions she fought against making; in her struggle to balance her need to stay true to herself against the danger of going against authority. Nafisi tells her own story, but she also weaves in pieces from the stories of those around her, giving her own narrative a context.

One passage in particular stuck out to me as a concise example of life in Iran in the late 1980s. At one point, the government has allowed censored, untranslated films by Russian director Andrei Tarkovsky to be shown. Though most people had never heard of Tarkovsky and did not speak Russian, Nafisi relates that people turned up in droves to see the films. She writes:

“Looking back on that time it seems to me that such rapture over Tarkovsky by an audience most of whom would not have known how to spell his name, and who would under normal circumstances have ignored or even disliked his work, arose from our intense sensory deprivation. We were thirsty for some form of beauty, even in an incomprehensible, overintellectual, abstract film with no subtitles and censored out of recognition. There was a sense of wonder at being in a public place for the first time in years without fear or anger, being in a place with a crowd of strangers that was not a demonstration, a protest rally, a breadline or a public execution.” (p. 206)

The full title of Nafisi’s memoir is Reading Lolita in Tehran: A Memoir in Books, and I think it is aptly named. It is through books, oftentimes, that Nafisi relates her experiences, comparing her situations to books or authors’ lives. Literature connects Nafisi with her peers; it brings together the girls in her book group. As I read Reading Lolita in Tehran, I began to realize how solidly a book can become tied to a place or event in a reader’s life. I can’t imagine Nafisi will ever be able to read The Great Gatsby without thinking of her time in Tehran, of the class when her students put the book on trial, of the fates of those students. I have not experienced anything like what Nafisi has, yet I know I do have books that are strongly linked with a particular time in my life. I bet many of us could write at least a partial memoir in books.

I think Nafisi would be a wonderful professor. I loved reading the occasional snippets of advice she imparted to her classes. In closing, I’ll leave you with my favorite:

“A novel is not an allegory, I said as the period was about to come to an end. It is the sensual experience of another world. If you don’t enter that world, hold your breath with the characters and become involved in their destiny, you won’t be able to empathize, and empathy is at the heart of the novel. This is how you read a novel: you in hale the experience. So start breathing. I just want you to remember this. That is all; class dismissed.” (p. 111)

Those are my thoughts. Check out Reading Lolita in Tehran by Azar Nafisi on GoodReads or LibraryThing, or read other bloggers’ reviews!

Your Turn!

Which books would be part of your memoir in books? What books have been important in your life?

CRP: “The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge” by Rainer Maria Rilke (Part 2)

The Classics Reclamation Project is my personal challenge to read and enjoy the classics. Each Wednesday, I post about the classic I’m reading at the moment.

The Classics Reclamation Project

Last week, I posted about my potential love for The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge by Rainer Maria Rilke, translated by the wonderful Stephen Mitchell, which I was reading for my IRL book group. I was loving the writing and the way the book dipped back and forth between fuzzy present impressions and straightforward childhood memories.

Sadly, I did not enjoy the second half of the book nearly as much. The pretty, sparkling passages that delighted me in the first half petered out. The memories, which started out so clear, got muddled. The present, which was already hazy, got downright confusing. I lost my footing in the murk of this seemingly different style.

The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge by Rainer Maria Rilke (cover)The book reads very much like a diary, though not the kind in which daily occurrences are dutifully noted. The “notebooks” are made up not so much of chapters, but of sections, the way a journal might look if one neglected to note the date or start a new page with each successive entry. As one might expect, there wasn’t much of a narrative arc. That was fine with me for the first half, when the scenes each made a kind of sense. In the second half, though, without that tenuous coherency, I felt like very little was holding the book together.

It’s interesting to note, as the introduction to my edition pointed out, that Rilke himself was living alone in Paris when this novel was published, like Malte does in the book. Some aspects of the novel are actually semi-autobiographical. This fact increased my intellectual interest in the book, but it did nothing to warm my heart to Malte and his notebooks.

Honestly, had I not had a reason beyond my own enjoyment to read The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge, I’d most likely have stopped half way through. It’s a book that just screams to have a paper written about it, or have a class taught on it, or be picked apart with a fine-toothed comb, none of which I’m in the mood to do. I do think this book will provide interesting fodder for a book group discussion and am looking forward to our meeting, which is scheduled for tonight.

I’m not judging Rilke solely on the basis of The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge. It was his only novel, so it clearly was not his primary format. I’m thinking his second chance will be Letters to a Young Poet…that seems like a safe bet!